Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends
Date: 2008-10-06 15:44:36
Message-ID: 3603F313-EDCE-4CC0-80F2-187A3253EB17@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Robert Treat wrote:
> select pg_relation_size(tablename) from pg_tables;
>
> since pg_tables is presented as a more user-friendly option to
> something like
> pg_class this might be something more widely used, plus we don't
> have the
> easy way out of just telling them to use the oid instead like we do
> with
> pg_class.

It would be really nice to have the table OID in pg_tables. That was
one of the driving forces behind the pg_newsysviews project.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Crawford 2008-10-06 15:47:29 Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring postgres
Previous Message Decibel! 2008-10-06 15:36:32 Re: Common Table Expressions applied; some issues remain