Re: [HACKERS] cidr

From: Nick Bastin <nbastin(at)rbbsystems(dot)com>
To: Paul A Vixie <vixie(at)vix(dot)com>, PgSql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cidr
Date: 1998-07-21 14:35:21
Message-ID: 35B4A728.24D94E8B@rbbsystems.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Paul A Vixie wrote:
> > I like INET too. It is up to you.
>
> How do folks feel about polymorphism between IPv4 and IPv6? Should we (a)
> make it work (either by making internal_length=10 or going variable length)
> or (b) just make this thing IPv4 only and take care of IPv6 separately/later?

Making it IPv4 only just means we'll have to do it again later, and having
IPv6 functionality now would be good for those of us who are currently working
with IPv6 networks...

Nick Bastin
Systems Administrator
RBb Systems

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-07-21 14:40:58 Re: [HACKERS] cidr
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-07-21 14:27:13 Re: [HACKERS] next XID is in shmem now...