Re: [HACKERS] cidr

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: nbastin(at)rbbsystems(dot)com (Nick Bastin)
Cc: vixie(at)vix(dot)com, PgSql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cidr
Date: 1998-07-21 15:02:11
Message-ID: 199807211502.LAA29018@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Paul A Vixie wrote:
> > > I like INET too. It is up to you.
> >
> > How do folks feel about polymorphism between IPv4 and IPv6? Should we (a)
> > make it work (either by making internal_length=10 or going variable length)
> > or (b) just make this thing IPv4 only and take care of IPv6 separately/later?
>
> Making it IPv4 only just means we'll have to do it again later, and having
> IPv6 functionality now would be good for those of us who are currently working
> with IPv6 networks...

Oh. OK. We do have variable-length types.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-07-21 15:03:43 Re: [HACKERS] cidr
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-07-21 15:01:10 Re: [HACKERS] cidr