Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, the NULL-pointer test might equally well be coded as an Assert:
> You really think it should be Assert?
I don't feel a need to change it, no. I was just pointing out that
there shouldn't be any way for a user to cause that condition to occur.
regards, tom lane