Re: bug in COPY

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in COPY
Date: 2002-08-27 20:24:48
Message-ID: 200208272024.g7RKOmL10918@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The exclamation point seems inappropriate. Perhaps "zero-length input"
> >> would be better than "string" also.
>
> > I copied the other test case:
>
> > if (s == (char *) NULL)
> > elog(ERROR, "pg_atoi: NULL pointer!");
>
> Well, the NULL-pointer test might equally well be coded as an Assert:
> it's to catch backend coding errors, not cases of incorrect user input.
> So the exclamation point there didn't bother me.

You really think it should be Assert? I don't mind opening the chance
to throw an error for bad input, but are you sure that a NULL should
never get there?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-27 20:30:53 Re: bug in COPY
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-27 20:21:11 Re: bug in COPY