| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |
| Date: | 2014-06-30 13:48:04 |
| Message-ID: | 3492.1404136084@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Done. I think this is because create_foreignscan_plan() makes reference
> to attr_needed, which isn't computed for inheritance children.
I wonder whether it isn't time to change that. It was coded like that
originally only because calculating the values would've been a waste of
cycles at the time. But this is at least the third place where it'd be
useful to have attr_needed for child rels.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-30 14:05:44 | Re: Spinlocks and compiler/memory barriers |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-06-30 13:42:43 | Re: RLS Design |