Re: VARDATA_COMPRESSED_GET_COMPRESS_METHOD comment?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VARDATA_COMPRESSED_GET_COMPRESS_METHOD comment?
Date: 2021-09-08 18:01:49
Message-ID: 3437463.1631124109@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:33 AM Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
>> How about "compressed-in-line Datum" like on the comment 5 lines above?

> That seems reasonable to me, but I think Tom Lane is responsible for
> the current form of that comment, so it'd be nice to hear what he
> thinks.

Hmm ... looks like I copied-and-pasted that comment to the wrong place
while rearranging stuff in aeb1631ed. The comment just below is
off-point too. Will fix.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Ladhe 2021-09-08 18:13:42 Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-09-08 17:52:33 Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?