| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search |
| Date: | 2013-12-05 05:30:22 |
| Message-ID: | 3422.1386221422@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 20:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Lazy people? I'm not in a hurry to drop it; it's not costing us much to
>> just sit there, other than in this connection which we see how to fix.
> Actually, I think it probably costs a fair portion of extension authors
> when their initial code crashes because they forgot to declare all their
> functions V1. I think it might actually be more of a bother to lazy
> people than a benefit.
Hm. We have heard one or two complaints like that, but not a huge number.
I'm worried about breaking code that's been working since god-knows-when;
but I will concede there's little evidence that there's very much of that
out there either.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2013-12-05 05:39:56 | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-12-05 05:17:59 | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |