Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Date: 2013-12-05 05:17:59
Message-ID: 1386220679.5734.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 09:02 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> This is certainly not a stupid idea, rather something on similar lines
> has been discussed previously in this thread.
> Tom has suggested something similar, but I am not sure if there was a
> conclusion on that point. Please see the
> relavant discussion at below link:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17384.1346645480@sss.pgh.pa.us

Yeah, I think the environment variable idea wasn't actually refuted
there.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-05 05:30:22 Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-12-05 05:16:37 Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search