| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SGML index build fix |
| Date: | 2007-01-07 04:38:53 |
| Message-ID: | 3413.1168144733@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.
This is just useless noise. If it could tell the difference between an
up-to-date index and a not-up-to-date one, there might be some value
to it ... but as-is I think it's just getting in the user's face.
Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.
I just got done reading an interesting comparison of MS Vista versus
Mac OS X:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196800670
The guy's very first complaint about Vista is how it demands your
attention constantly with trivial warning messages. This seems in much
the same vein.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-07 04:49:27 | Re: SGML index build fix |
| Previous Message | Colin Taylor | 2007-01-07 04:37:08 | table partioning performance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-07 04:49:27 | Re: SGML index build fix |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-07 04:28:23 | SGML index build fix |