From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix |
Date: | 2007-01-07 04:58:26 |
Message-ID: | 1168145906.869.24.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 23:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> > that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.
>
> This is just useless noise. If it could tell the difference between an
> up-to-date index and a not-up-to-date one, there might be some value
> to it ... but as-is I think it's just getting in the user's face.
> Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.
No, not everyone knows. In fact I would argue that most do not know. It
isn't intuitive to the process. You *expect* that an index will be made.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-07 05:42:06 | Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-07 04:50:27 | Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-07 05:42:06 | Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-07 04:50:27 | Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix |