Re: pgsql: Provide overflow safe integer math inline functions.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Provide overflow safe integer math inline functions.
Date: 2017-12-17 16:03:49
Message-ID: 3357.1513526629@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... Please note that if you added
> a volatile cast to "result" as well, then compilation was able to
> complete and regression tests passed...

Yeah, that squares with my analysis: the problem with the existing test
is that the compiler is throwing away the function call because its
output is unused.

If I haven't seen something from Andres shortly, I'll push a fix.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-12-17 16:52:26 pgsql: Try harder to detect unavailability of __builtin_mul_overflow(in
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-12-17 07:00:31 Re: pgsql: Provide overflow safe integer math inline functions.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-12-17 20:29:08 Re: Top-N sorts verses parallelism
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-12-17 15:50:38 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table