Re: Statement-level rollback

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Statement-level rollback
Date: 2017-10-01 22:25:48
Message-ID: 33368289-0B66-4131-B29C-1D82833FD6DF@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

> On 15 Sep 2017, at 16:19, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> On 01 Sep 2017, at 13:44, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On 14 August 2017 at 23:58, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 2/28/17 02:39, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
>>>> The code for stored functions is not written yet, but I'd like your feedback for the specification and design based on the current patch. I'll add this patch to CommitFest 2017-3.
>>>
>>> This patch needs to be rebased for the upcoming commit fest.
>>
>> I'm willing to review this if the patch is going to be actively worked on.
>
> This sounds like a too good offer to pass up on, can we expect a rebased patch
> for the commitfest?

Since this patch was Waiting for author during the entire commitfest without
updates, I’m marking it Returned with Feedback. When a new version is ready it
can be re-submitted to the then open commitfest.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-10-01 22:27:46 Re: Logging idle checkpoints
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2017-10-01 22:19:33 Logging idle checkpoints

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-10-02 16:30:25 Re: [JDBC] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Previous Message eperez 2017-10-01 00:24:42 [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] 15aec6: Someone forgot to get the next column (#973)