Re: Error-safe user functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
Date: 2022-12-05 18:00:04
Message-ID: 3323802.1670263204@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Wait a minute! Oh, no, sorry, as you were, 'errsave' is fine.

Seems like everybody's okay with errsave. I'll make a v2 in a
little bit. I'd like to try updating array_in and/or record_in
just to verify that indirection cases work okay, before we consider
the design to be set.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-12-05 18:04:39 Re: ANY_VALUE aggregate
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-12-05 17:56:44 Re: ANY_VALUE aggregate