Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: yuzuko <yuzukohosoya(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)
Date: 2021-03-11 16:06:36
Message-ID: 330ba877-db0f-c2e0-d354-3c6a9c311d17@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/14/20 8:46 PM, yuzuko wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:28 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Attach the new patch based on his patch. What do you think?

Álvaro, Justin, Kyotaro, thoughts on this latest patch?

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2021-03-11 16:08:47 Re: documentation fix for SET ROLE
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-03-11 16:00:13 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq