| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp" <Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)mitsubishielectric(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Ilya Gladyshev <i(dot)gladyshev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Partial aggregates pushdown |
| Date: | 2023-04-08 01:55:00 |
| Message-ID: | 3278991.1680918900@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> What I don't want is an error-prone setup where administrators have to
> remember what the per-server settings are. Based on your suggestion,
> let's allow CREATE SERVER to have an option 'enable_async_aggregate' (is
> that the right name?), which defaults to 'true' for _all_ servers, even
> those that don't support async aggregates.
Uh, what? Why would we not be able to tell from the remote server's
version number whether it has this ability?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2023-04-08 02:00:34 | Re: Kerberos delegation support in libpq and postgres_fdw |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-04-08 01:52:32 | Re: daitch_mokotoff module |