Re: Removing binaries (was: createlang/droplang deprecated)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removing binaries (was: createlang/droplang deprecated)
Date: 2017-03-19 20:26:32
Message-ID: 32655.1489955192@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I wish 'pg' wasn't an already used binary name. It'd be much nicer if
> we had a '/usr/bin/pg' wrapper binary in the git style, that we could easily
> expand over time, without hitting new conflicts. I'd even consider a
> '/usr/bin/pgsql' that has commands for all our binaries a considerable
> improvement in the long term.

Meh. I'm not seeing where "pg command args" is that much superior to
"pg_command args". Yeah, if we'd done it like that from the beginning
it'd be fine; but people are used to the latter style and I don't feel
a need to make them change over.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2017-03-19 20:29:44 Re: Removing binaries (was: createlang/droplang deprecated)
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2017-03-19 20:23:09 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless)