| From: | Francisco Leovey <fleovey(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jean-Yves F(dot) Barbier" <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: images in one or more tables? |
| Date: | 2011-06-12 20:49:12 |
| Message-ID: | 323608.55576.qm@web39306.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
We only put http links (with other fields with descriptions and dates, etc) to images in the DB, makes backups and maintenance much easier, not to mention updates.
--- On Sun, 6/12/11, Jean-Yves F. Barbier <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
From: Jean-Yves F. Barbier <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] images in one or more tables?
To: "Alan Hodgson" <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Date: Sunday, June 12, 2011, 5:36 PM
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:24:39 -0700, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> wrote:
Thanks Allan.
..
> It would definitely make maintenance easier to split them up.
>
> Big tables are a pain.
--
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Yves F. Barbier | 2011-06-12 21:41:19 | Re: images in one or more tables? |
| Previous Message | Jean-Yves F. Barbier | 2011-06-12 20:36:32 | Re: images in one or more tables? |