Re: images in one or more tables?

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:49:12 -0700 (PDT), Francisco Leovey <fleovey(at)yahoo(dot)com>
wrote:

>>>>[Don't feed the troll: images *will stay* in table(s)]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Can't you read?

> We only put http links (with other fields with descriptions and dates, etc)
> to images in the DB, makes backups and maintenance much easier, not to
> mention updates.
>
> --- On Sun, 6/12/11, Jean-Yves F. Barbier <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Jean-Yves F. Barbier <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Subject: Re: [NOVICE] images in one or more tables?
> To: "Alan Hodgson" <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
> Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Date: Sunday, June 12, 2011, 5:36 PM
>
>
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:24:39 -0700, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> wrote:
>
> Thanks Allan.
>
> ..
> > It would definitely make maintenance easier to split them up.
> >
> > Big tables are a pain.
>
>
>

--
Smoking is the leading cause of statistics.