Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?
Date: 2006-03-03 18:27:56
Message-ID: 3224.1141410476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> (I'm not finding it right now, but I'm pretty sure that the SUS
>> specifies that numeric userid == 0 for superuser, whereas "root" is not
>> required to be the name, so this would be more correct anyway.)

> Can we assume 'id' is on all unix systems?

What's your point? The script fails anyway if that bit doesn't work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Pitt 2006-03-03 18:36:37 Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, patch take #3
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2006-03-03 18:26:21 Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?