Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?
Date: 2006-03-03 18:39:55
Message-ID: 200603031839.k23Idtm21243@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> (I'm not finding it right now, but I'm pretty sure that the SUS
> >> specifies that numeric userid == 0 for superuser, whereas "root" is not
> >> required to be the name, so this would be more correct anyway.)
>
> > Can we assume 'id' is on all unix systems?
>
> What's your point? The script fails anyway if that bit doesn't work.

Is 'id' better than what we have now if 'id' isn't widely supported?

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-03 18:40:45 Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes
Previous Message Martin Pitt 2006-03-03 18:36:37 Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, patch take #3