| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: Emacs vs pg_indent's weird indentation for function declarations |
| Date: | 2019-05-19 17:27:21 |
| Message-ID: | 32165.1558286841@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me> writes:
> On 17/05/2019 16.48, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It doesn't really seem practical to me to make the lookahead function
>> smart enough to tell the difference between attributes and K&R-style
>> parameter declarations. What I'm thinking of doing to have an
>> upstreamable patch is to invent a new switch, perhaps '-kr'/'-nkr',
>> to indicate whether the user is more worried about K&R function
>> declarations than she is about function attributes.
> I think it's safe to assume that upstream can drop support for K&R-style
> parameters altogether.
Cool. I already created the switch, but maybe we could have it
default to -nkr?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-05-19 17:38:45 | Re: Multivariate MCV stats can leak data to unprivileged users |
| Previous Message | Piotr Stefaniak | 2019-05-19 17:25:05 | Re: Emacs vs pg_indent's weird indentation for function declarations |