Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Translations contributions urgently needed
Date: 2018-02-23 15:41:38
Message-ID: 31524.1519400498@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
> Something that isn't clear to me is, for a language that didn't meet
> 80% translation for a component, if it does reach 80% after the major
> version release, does it then get shipped in a minor release, or is
> out of that version completely until the next major version?

No, it'll be added to the next minor release as soon as it reaches
80%. That's happened routinely in the past. I have no idea how
automated that policy is -- you could ask Peter E. -- but a trawl
through the commit logs shows .po files getting added in minor
releases from time to time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-02-23 15:48:35 Re: Translations contributions urgently needed
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-02-23 14:49:24 Re: Online enabling of checksums