Re: stress test for parallel workers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stress test for parallel workers
Date: 2019-08-07 04:29:19
Message-ID: 31032.1565152159@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I wondered if the build farm should try to report OOM kill -9 or other
> signal activity affecting the postmaster.

Yeah, I've been wondering whether pg_ctl could fork off a subprocess
that would fork the postmaster, wait for the postmaster to exit, and then
report the exit status. Where to report it *to* seems like the hard part,
but maybe an answer that worked for the buildfarm would be enough for now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2019-08-07 04:58:34 Re: no default hash partition
Previous Message Li Japin 2019-08-07 04:21:41 Re: Built-in connection pooler