From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: no default hash partition |
Date: | 2019-08-07 04:58:34 |
Message-ID: | 20190807.135834.105525400.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Tue, 6 Aug 2019 23:26:19 -0400, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CA+TgmoZpAsYY+naYpuw+fG=J1wYTXrhk=3uEYYa_Nz=Jwck+eg(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think, as Amit says, that having an automatic partition creation
> feature for hash partitions (and maybe other kinds, but certainly for
> hash) would be a useful thing to add to the system. I also think that
> it might be useful to add some commands to automate partition
> splitting (and maybe combining) although I think there's some design
> work to be done there to figure out exactly what we should build. I
> don't think it's ever useful to have a hash-partitioned table with an
> incomplete set of partitions long term, but it makes things simpler to
> allow that temporarily, for example during dump restoration.
> Therefore, I see no reason why we would want to go to the trouble of
> allowing hash-partitioned tables to have default partitions; it would
> just encourage people to do things that don't really make any sense.
+1.
By the way, couldn't we offer a means to check for gaps in a hash
partition? For example, the output of current \d+ <parent>
contains the Partitoins section that shows a list of
partitions. I think that we can show all gaps there.
=# \d+ p
Partitioned table "public.p"
...
Partition key: HASH (a)
Partitions: c1 FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 4, remainder 0),
c3 FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 4, remainder 3),
GAP (modulus 4, remainder 1),
GAP (modulus 4, remainder 2)
Or
Partitions: c1 FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 4, remainder 0),
c3 FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 4, remainder 3),
Gaps: (modulus 4, remainder 1), (modulus 4, remainder 2)
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-08-07 05:00:29 | Re: stress test for parallel workers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-08-07 04:29:19 | Re: stress test for parallel workers |