Re: Sourceforge PG release

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release
Date: 2009-07-06 05:04:50
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0907052204h37f08774wb015d32d3ed008db@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Fwiw, i think having an sf.net project is a *bad* idea anyway. It's
> confusing for people who find that project and don't realise it's not
> actually used for anything. It seems a strange thing to maintain
> anyway - it's not exactly likely to attract new users.
>

yeah! i was wondering about the very same thing... what's the
usefulness for maintaining a sf.net project?

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2009-07-06 12:47:21 Re: Remove support company
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2009-07-05 22:46:49 Re: Sourceforge PG release