John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 4/26/18, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> (The prosrc-from-proname case, in isolation, could be handled about
>> as well by adding a hardwired rule like we have for pronargs.)
> If we think we might go in the direction of more special-case
> behavior, the attached patch more fully documents what we already do,
> and does some minor refactoring to make future additions more
> straightforward. I think this would even be good to do for v11.
Agreed, pushed.
regards, tom lane