| From: | Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> |
|---|---|
| To: | Holger Krug <hkrug(at)rationalizer(dot)com>, Michael Devogelaere <michael(at)digibel(dot)be> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL |
| Date: | 2002-01-25 12:46:24 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20020125204624.016ff420@192.228.128.13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 11:26 AM 1/25/02 +0100, Holger Krug wrote:
>so I won't repeat that stuff here), but I know that for scenarios like
>yours connection pooling was invented. Connection pooling avoids the
>creation of a new backend process for each single query. Did you ever
>try your test with connection pooling ? Real databases *require*
>connection pooling in such a case, MySQL or file systems
If the database crashes are not due to resource limits, connection pooling
does not seem to be the real solution.
If postgresql crashes after X concurrent backends are respawned Y times I
figure something is wrong and should be fixed.
Regards,
Link.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sulakshana Awsarikar | 2002-01-25 13:25:37 | Inserting Non English characters in a varchar type field |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2002-01-25 11:51:41 | typo in contrib/oid2name |