From: | "Anthony E(dot) Greene" <agreene(at)pobox(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | [OT] How to avoid using Reply-All on this list |
Date: | 2000-06-02 10:22:08 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000602122208.007e6d00@pop03.ca.us.ibm.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-novice |
If you don't have access to procmail and formail on your mail server, you
can ignore this message.
When I post to lists that don't add a Reply-To header to list messages,
repliers often use the Reply-All function of their mail client. This sends
one reply to the list and another to me. I dislike getting multiple copies.
If I'm sending a reply to a list message, I almost always want to send a
single copy to the list address. I don't want to take the time to
copy/paste or type the list address. I don't want to use Reply-All because
I don't want the original poster to have to deal with multiple copies (see
preceding paragraph).
So I need a way to have my mail client act as if the message had a Reply-To
header. Solution: Add the Reply-To header before I get the mail. The
following procmail recipe that does exactly that. Th recipe will work
whether you read your mail on the server or via POP3.
# Add a Reply-To header to pgsql list messages.
:0
* ^X-Mailing-List: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
{
:0 f
| formail -a "Reply-To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org"
# Uncomment the following if filtering to a file/folder.
#:0:
#path/to/mailfile
}
Tony
--
Anthony E. Greene <agreene(at)pobox(dot)com>
PGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
Linux: The choice of a GNU Generation.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pragati Sagar | 2000-06-02 11:05:29 | Accessing the database |
Previous Message | Marcel | 2000-06-02 10:06:32 | CYGWIN1.DLL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eric Naujock | 2000-06-02 14:10:00 | Strange problem starting up. Postgres 7.0. |
Previous Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2000-06-02 08:57:57 | Re: Performance - fsync-off |