Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend

From: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend
Date: 2025-11-05 06:30:59
Message-ID: 2fb1d9923b6995492e7b163e6cb95402@postgrespro.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi.

Matheus Alcantara писал(а) 2025-11-03 16:00:
> So I'm +1 for the idea. I know it's been while since the last patch,
> and
> unfortunully it hasn't received reviews since then. Do you still plan
> to
> work on it? I still need to take a look on the code to see if I can
> help
> with some comments.
>
> During the tests I got compiler errors due to fce7c73fba4, so I'm
> attaching a v5 with guc_parameters.dat correctly sorted.
>
> The postgres_fdw/regress tests was also failling due to some whitespace
> problems, v5 also fix this.
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202510251154.isknefznk566%40alvherre.pgsql
>

I'm still interested in working on this patch, but it didn't get any
review (besides internal one). I suppose, Append and MergeAppend nodes
need some unification, for example, ExecAppendAsyncEventWait and
ExecMergeAppendAsyncEventWait looks the same, both
classify_matching_subplans() versions are suspiciously similar. But
honestly, patch needs thorough review.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
Postgres Professional

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2025-11-05 06:38:56 Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.
Previous Message shveta malik 2025-11-05 06:19:28 Re: How can end users know the cause of LR slot sync delays?