Re: Potentially misleading name of libpq pass phrase hook

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Potentially misleading name of libpq pass phrase hook
Date: 2020-05-16 13:40:57
Message-ID: 2d778d3e-094d-165f-baba-48661f2afc09@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 5/15/20 8:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-May-15, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:03 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>>> Since we haven't shipped this there is still time to rename, which
>>> IMO is the right way forward. PQsslKeyPassHook_<library>_type would
>>> be one option, but perhaps there are better alternatives?
>> ISTM this should be renamed yeah -- and it should probably go on the open
>> item lists, and with the schedule for the beta perhaps dealt with rather
>> urgently?
> Seems easy enough to do! +1 on Daniel's suggested renaming.
>
> CCing Andrew as committer.
>

I'll attend to this today.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2020-05-16 13:58:23 valgrind vs force_parallel_mode=regress
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2020-05-16 13:23:09 Re: calling procedures is slow and consumes extra much memory against calling function