| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PGQ catalog representation and pg_dump support |
| Date: | 2026-09-07 19:34:28 |
| Message-ID: | 2c117e19-4736-4486-89b4-e66c56d1bb12@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03.09.26 23:32, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2026 at 4:53 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>> On 02.09.26 21:29, Melanie Plageman wrote:
>>> As such, unless we are misunderstanding something about the
>>> discussion, we feel it would be better to revert this in 19. That
>>> would take off the time pressure now and would make it easier to fix
>>> these things properly in 20 without having to be burdened by backwards
>>> compatibility and backpatching.
>>
>> Ok, let's do it.
>>
>> For clarification: Revert from REL_19_STABLE only, or also from master?
>
> IMHO, this needs enough rework that it should come out of both.
done
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aidar Imamov | 2026-09-07 19:59:22 | Re: BgBufferSync(): clarification about reusable_buffers variable |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2026-09-07 19:15:00 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) backend waits indefinitely when decoding worker fails to start |