| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PGQ catalog representation and pg_dump support |
| Date: | 2026-09-03 21:32:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZdb5+OPbZWNGsKL516OjBDaEP9cN5wU2gdzJ8fgJzVRg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 3, 2026 at 4:53 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> On 02.09.26 21:29, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> > As such, unless we are misunderstanding something about the
> > discussion, we feel it would be better to revert this in 19. That
> > would take off the time pressure now and would make it easier to fix
> > these things properly in 20 without having to be burdened by backwards
> > compatibility and backpatching.
>
> Ok, let's do it.
>
> For clarification: Revert from REL_19_STABLE only, or also from master?
IMHO, this needs enough rework that it should come out of both.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-09-03 21:11:40 | Re: auto-vectorize varbit bitwise operators |