Why Postgres rocks Re: Monty wants to un-GPL MySQL

From: Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Why Postgres rocks Re: Monty wants to un-GPL MySQL
Date: 2010-01-04 23:13:02
Message-ID: 2b5e566d1001041513o855437eu145ad3225b7a6651@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Hi!

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:48 PM, decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:

> Perhaps Monty should just give up and start using Postgres. :)

The points I'd like to see emphasized "out there" are that Postgres
developers have taken many steps to ensure the long-term health of the
project - intentionally diversifying where key developers work, and
accepting patches from a large number of independent contributors.
Structural things - like clearly documented coding standards, a
rigorous (if sometimes tedious) review process and Tom Lane's constant
presence - makes the code produced by the project incredibly high
quality.

Further recent actions - extensive work on creating and then executing
the Commit Fests, and increasing the number of core committers - help
make sure our software will continue to be competitive, and actively
developed for many years.

If you are going to blog about this situation -- and I hope many of
you do -- please talk about what is good about our community and
development process, and how you've contributed to that.

-selena

--
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
http://endpoint.com - work

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2010-01-10 02:45:18 PGCon 2010
Previous Message decibel 2010-01-04 22:48:47 Monty wants to un-GPL MySQL