Re: 8.2 features status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-04 16:40:36
Message-ID: 29777.1154709636@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> And what about compression of on-disk sorting?

That's purely a performance issue, which some people seem to want
to define as "not a new feature" ... which is not *my* view of
what's important ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Lor 2006-08-04 16:41:52 Re: LWLock statistics collector
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-04 16:38:55 Re: 8.2 features status