| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |
| Date: | 2023-05-03 16:25:09 |
| Message-ID: | 2977612.1683131109@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 9:00 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> wrote:
>> I don't see why this is an open item as this feature was not committed
>> for v16. Open items typically revolve around committed features.
> The argument is that updating the psql \d views to show the newly added
> options is something that the patch to add those options should have done
> before being committed.
Yeah, if there is not any convenient way to see that info in psql
then that seems like a missing part of the feature.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2023-05-03 16:30:34 | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-05-03 16:13:57 | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |