Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?

From: "Tony Lausin" <tonylausin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
Date: 2006-04-30 19:32:53
Message-ID: 296cdcaf0604301232o109a6e6p89a168200385e04a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> [ rotfl... ] MySQL will fall over under any heavy concurrent-write
> scenario. It's conceivable that PG won't do what you need either,
> but if not I'm afraid you're going to be forced into Oracle or one
> of the other serious-money DBs.
>
> regards, tom lane

Hi Tom,

That's a scary idea - being forced into Oracle or Sybase. Isn't
Slashdot.org still running strongly off of MySQL?

Regards,

Anthony

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2006-04-30 20:40:09 Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
Previous Message Tony Lausin 2006-04-30 19:23:31 Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?