| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add support for logging the current role |
| Date: | 2011-02-11 16:26:51 |
| Message-ID: | 29556.1297441611@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Kevin Grittner
> <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>> Should we abbreviate something there? max_pred_locks_per_tran,
>> maybe?
> If we're going to abbreviate transaction, I'd vote for txn over tran,
> but I think Stephen's point that this is already a lost cause may have
> some validity. Not sure what other people think.
Aren't we already using "xact" for that purpose in some user-visible
places? But personally I'd be happy with "max_pred_locks_per_transaction"
which gets the worst case down without being too obviously at variance
with "max_locks_per_transaction".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-02-11 16:31:08 | Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-02-11 16:23:31 | Re: Add support for logging the current role |