| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: reducing isolation tests runtime |
| Date: | 2018-01-25 20:58:04 |
| Message-ID: | 29555.1516913884@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Here's a concrete proposal. Runtime is 45.7 seconds on my laptop. It
> can be further reduced, but not by more than a second or two unless you
> get in the business of modifying other tests. (I only modified
> deadlock-soft-2 because it saves 5 seconds).
Looks reasonable to me, but do we want to set any particular convention
about the max number of tests to run in parallel? If so there should
be at least a comment saying what.
> Admittedly the new isolation_schedule file is a bit ugly.
Meh, seems fine.
We won't know if this really works till it hits the buildfarm,
I suppose.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-01-25 21:27:28 | Re: reducing isolation tests runtime |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-01-25 20:34:15 | Re: reducing isolation tests runtime |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-01-25 21:21:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-01-25 20:52:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump |