| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matteo <sgala(at)sgala(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: vacuum is not sufficient? |
| Date: | 2003-08-08 19:56:27 |
| Message-ID: | 29458.1060372587@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Matteo <sgala(at)sgala(dot)com> writes:
> INFO: --Relation public.active_sessions_split--
> INFO: Index active_sessions_split_pkey: Pages 91838; Tuples 5381: Deleted 31.
> CPU 4.26s/0.47u sec elapsed 135.47 sec.
> INFO: Index k_asp_changed: Pages 46192; Tuples 5381: Deleted 31.
> CPU 2.32s/0.25u sec elapsed 34.94 sec.
> INFO: Removed 31 tuples in 6 pages.
> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.01 sec.
> INFO: Pages 78376: Changed 4, Empty 0; Tup 5381: Vac 31, Keep 0, UnUsed 615471.
> Total CPU 9.93s/1.13u sec elapsed 186.68 sec.
I'd try a dump/reload or CLUSTER to get the table back down to a
reasonable size. In future, try vacuuming it more often.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-08-11 03:02:48 | Re: ALTER TABLE table RENAME TO sould change also sequence name |
| Previous Message | Silvio Scarpati | 2003-08-08 19:12:14 | Re: UNION discards indentical rows in postgres 7.3.3 |