vacuum is not sufficient?

From: Matteo <sgala(at)sgala(dot)com>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: vacuum is not sufficient?
Date: 2003-08-08 16:49:21
Message-ID: 20030808164921.GE25344@sgala.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hello list!

I'm using postgresql 7.3.2r1-6.woody
from http://people.debian.org/~elphick/debian
in some production enviroment.

I had in the past with the stable release of postgres in debian woody a
problem about
"enlarging tables". In particular session tables with a lot of traffic
became from some Megs to a couple of gigs...
After upgrade to newer version that problem now is returned after about 1-2
month of working...

this is the "tipical" vacuum output that I have in those tables...

INFO: --Relation public.active_sessions_split--
INFO: Index active_sessions_split_pkey: Pages 91838; Tuples 5381: Deleted 31.
CPU 4.26s/0.47u sec elapsed 135.47 sec.
INFO: Index k_asp_changed: Pages 46192; Tuples 5381: Deleted 31.
CPU 2.32s/0.25u sec elapsed 34.94 sec.
INFO: Removed 31 tuples in 6 pages.
CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.01 sec.
INFO: Pages 78376: Changed 4, Empty 0; Tup 5381: Vac 31, Keep 0, UnUsed 615471.
Total CPU 9.93s/1.13u sec elapsed 186.68 sec.

-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 724M Aug 8 18:47 309922
(the table file)

and with vacuum , vacuum full nothing change...

and the same problem in other db with high load average tables...

it's a bug or what? some ideas?

Thanks in advance!

Matteo

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-08 17:18:08 Re: upcoming 7.4 relaese: absent recode() function ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-08 14:26:32 Re: upcoming 7.4 relaese: absent recode() function ?