Re: A really subtle lexer bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A really subtle lexer bug
Date: 2018-08-23 15:54:30
Message-ID: 29360.1535039670@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom> * Some regression tests exercising these code paths might be a
> Tom> good thing.

> Agreed. Any preferences where they should go?

There's not really a "lexer/grammar" test script. Maybe you could
drop it into create_operator.sql, especially if you need to make any
funny operators to test with?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-08-23 18:10:46 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Improve OR conditions on joined columns (common star schema problem)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-23 15:48:35 Re: Getting NOT NULL constraint from pg_attribute