From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: allow specifying direct role membership in pg_hba.conf |
Date: | 2021-05-17 21:55:04 |
Message-ID: | 2918043.1621288504@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> writes:
> On 05/17/21 16:35, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> So you're saying that some entries int he parameter section would
>> depend on the db/user/ip combo and some would depend just on the ip?
> I don't *think* that's what I was saying. What I was thinking was this:
> ...
This seems pretty horrid to me, not only from a complexity standpoint,
but because it would break the principle that pg_hba.conf entries are
applied in order.
On the whole, I'm afraid that this idea is going to create a lot
more problems than it solves.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2021-05-17 22:07:30 | Re: Typo in README.barrier |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-17 21:51:54 | Re: pgsql: Move tablespace path re-creation from the makefiles to pg_regres |