Re: "value" a reserved word

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "value" a reserved word
Date: 2002-11-22 23:05:35
Message-ID: 29030.1038006335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> In light of trying to become fully ISO/ANSI compliant (or even savvy ;)
> could we not make a jump at say 7.4 to having the same set of reserved
> keywords as SQL92/SQL99 and be done with it?

I disagree ... especially for SQL99 keywords that we're not even using.

Also, SQL99 keywords that are actually only function names would be
outright more difficult to reserve than not to reserve...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-11-22 23:21:48 Re: quote_ident and schemas (was Re: [HACKERS] connectby with schema)
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2002-11-22 22:56:40 Re: "value" a reserved word