Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Date: 2016-03-03 06:10:58
Message-ID: 29003.1456985458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> I've modified buildfarm member mandrill to use force_parallel_mode=regress and
> max_parallel_degree=5; a full run passes. We'll now see if it intermittently
> fails the stats test, like Tom witnessed:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30385.1456077923@sss.pgh.pa.us

http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mandrill&dt=2016-03-02%2023%3A34%3A10

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-03-03 06:34:08 Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-03-03 06:06:56 Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.