Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Date: 2016-02-28 00:05:47
Message-ID: 20160228000547.GA663083@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:16:58PM +0530, Robert Haas wrote:
> Committed these patches after revising the comment you wrote and
> adding documentation.

I've modified buildfarm member mandrill to use force_parallel_mode=regress and
max_parallel_degree=5; a full run passes. We'll now see if it intermittently
fails the stats test, like Tom witnessed:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30385.1456077923@sss.pgh.pa.us

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2016-02-28 00:33:33 Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
Previous Message Thom Brown 2016-02-27 22:54:36 Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data