Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date: 2018-07-26 12:51:53
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/25/2018 06:08 PM, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> WITH ctename AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] (query)

I think "NOT MATERIALIZED" would be a bit misleading since the planner
may choose to materialize anyway, so I suggest skipping that part of the
syntax unless there is a really strong reason for having it.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-07-26 13:51:54 Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-07-26 12:11:01 Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.