Re: Win32 timezone matching

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 timezone matching
Date: 2010-04-06 22:02:24
Message-ID: 28938.1270591344@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oh, another thought here: what is the effect of the combination of this
with your other proposal to add more timezones to the list? In
particular, what happens if we use the extended list in an unpatched
system that doesn't know about those new zone names? I'm wondering
if we *have* to make this change for that to behave sanely. We might
also need to consider whether we want any log chatter in such a case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-04-06 22:19:19 Re: pg_filedump strangeness
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-04-06 21:59:55 Re: Win32 timezone matching