Re: pg_index.isclustered can work

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_index.isclustered can work
Date: 2001-05-15 02:29:47
Message-ID: 28530.989893787@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I can easily have pg_index.indisclustered updated to 'true' if you ever
> CLUSTER the index. Is that useful to anyone? Remember, clustering
> doesn't remain if you modify the table.

I don't see any value in it as long as CLUSTER is in the disreputable
shape it's in. I don't really like giving people the impression that
CLUSTER is a supported operation ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2001-05-15 02:50:17 RE: Updating system catalogs after a tuple deletion
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-05-15 02:12:24 RE: Updating system catalogs after a tuple deletion