Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress
Date: 2019-02-18 16:18:19
Message-ID: 28360.1550506699@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-Feb-18, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> We should also strive to align "FAILED" properly.

>> Yeah, not strictly required, but someone might want to play around with
>> it a bit.

> FWIW I don't think we localize pg_regress output currently, so that
> argument seems moot ... But I think we can get away with constant four
> spaces for now.

I pushed Peter's suggestion for %8.0f; let's live with that for a little
and see if it's still annoying.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-02-18 16:28:24 Re: Copy function for logical replication slots
Previous Message Oleksii Kliukin 2019-02-18 16:05:13 Prepared transaction releasing locks before deregistering its GID